New York City’s Community Preference policy is the subject of an ongoing lawsuit opposing it, Winfield v. the City of New York. Plaintiffs claim that the policy has racially discriminatory impacts and perpetuates the harmful legacy of segregation. Proponents of the policy argue that it is a critical tool to prevent the displacement of low-income residents and communities from neighborhoods where housing costs are rapidly rising.

In 2019, new studies on the impacts of Community Preference surfaced, after being commissioned byWinfield plaintiffs and defendant to substantiate either side’s claims. Does the policy perpetuate segregation? Or does it protect communities of color from displacement? What is the right balance between these complex, and sometimes conflicting policy goals? These are some of the most complex and pressing housing policy challenges facing New York today.

In Community Preference Policy in NYC, CHPC reaches a few key conclusions:

 

    • The lawsuit around Community Preference raises some of the most pressing challenges facing NYC today, yet the issues at stake are complex and nuanced in ways that can be lost in litigation. 
    • The 2019 report on the plaintiff side criticizing Community Preference is highly flawed in methodology, inaccurate, and misleading.
    • Future discussion around these policy issues needs to be preceded by objective analysis, so that it can remain nuanced and grounded in facts.
    • The City needs to make housing lottery data available, with limits in place to protect participant privacy.

Read CHPC’s white paper to learn more about the Winfield v. the City of New York lawsuit, the 2019 studies supporting it, and the critical housing policy issues at stake.